Neri Y. Ariel
Dr. Neri Y. Ariel obtained his Ph.D. in Talmud and Halacha at Hebrew University (July 2019). Ariel is a Post-Doctoral research fellow and lecturer in Israel and Germany. Ariel completed recently a joint research project as an interoffice collaboration (ZJS, FUB & Menczer, HUJI). Additionally, as cooperation partner at the Institute of Jewish History in Austria (INJOEST), at the University of Vienna and at the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW), he researches Hebrew fragments retrieved from Book-Binding deepening the understanding of medieval Jewish traditions in Europe. Ariel’s Ph.D. research has focused on his discovery of a hitherto unknown genre within Judaeo-Arabic literature named Adab al-Qādi (“etiquette of judgeship” earlier known in its Hebrew name חובות הדיינין).
Comparative Judaeo-Islamic Legal History: Adab al-Qāḍī
This research will supply extensive examples of content-related parallels and structural equivalents of Geniza remnants in this newly discovered Judaeo–Arabic subgenre and already-known works by their Muslim contemporaries in a well-based genre. Examining textual proximities and the possible ideological juxtaposition of the legal, philosophical, and literary contexts, I wish to ponder several issues characteristic of the distinguished Adab al-Qādi or the judges’ duties genre (Heb. hovot ha-dayyanim) relating to questions such as the judge’s ethical character, the perception of the adjudicative process, and the comprehension of civil procedure. The publication of this jurisprudentially contextualized monograph will be a breakthrough in interdisciplinary and interreligious Judaeo-Islamic research.
Tiraana Bains is a Ph.D. Candidate in the History Department at Yale University. Her research is focused on questions of state formation, political culture, and political economy in the global British empire and South Asia in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. She is currently completing a dissertation titled, ‘Making, Debating and Practicing Empire in South Asia, circa 1756–1799.’
Making and Debating Imperial Transitions in South Asia, circa 1756-1799
This project examines multi-sided and often vicious contests over the configuration and conduct of a British imperial state in eighteenth century South Asia. It contends that the transformation of British imperial rule in South Asia in the second half of the eighteenth century did not proceed from an inevitable and consensual thrust towards consolidation and centralization. Debates over the British state and empire in South Asia did not simply feature voices in London or Calcutta; nor was there a single, monolithic and “official” understanding of empire. A range of actors, situated across the expanse of the global British empire from Boston to Bencoolen, and in territories outside formal British control, from Benares to Arcot, debated the everyday workings and reform of the British empire and in the process, pushed and redefined the boundaries of political participation. The remaking and partial centralization of imperial rule thus occurred amidst and in opposition to multiple alternative proposals. By providing a polyvalent history of both imperial thought and practices, this project recovers the role and agency of South Asian actors, from the Mughal Emperor himself to humble weaver communities, in debating and attempting to shape British imperium in South Asia.
Erik de Lange
Erik de Lange is a postdoctoral researcher and lecturer at Utrecht University. He has recently completed his PhD thesis ‘Menacing Tides. Security, Piracy and Empire in the Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean’ at Utrecht University, where he worked within the ERC-funded research project ‘Securing Europe, Fighting its Enemies. The Making of a Security Culture in Europe and Beyond, 1815-1914’. He has published with Cambridge University Press, Böhlau and Routledge and is the chief editor of the Utrecht School for Historicizing Security Blog.
The Course of Empire: Knowledge and its Circulation in the U.S. Mediterranean Squadron, 1816-1860
Historians have started to incorporate knowledge into their conceptualizations of sea power, but they often focus solely on hydrography. Furthering on those new historiographical ventures, this research project poses the question: what knowledge of the Mediterranean did naval actors aboard the U.S. Mediterranean squadron produce and circulate between 1816 and 1860? By inquiring into knowledge ‘of’ the Mediterranean, this project will uncover how navies helped engender understandings of the Mediterranean as a regional whole. The project will thus shed new light on the nineteenth-century re-imaging of the Mediterranean Sea and point to the overlooked American involvement in this transformation.
University of Cambridge
Jonathan Dixon is a PhD History student at the University of Cambridge. He is interested in how geographical and religious ignorance and mythology led early modern Europeans to explore and colonise Africa, the Americas and Asia. He completed his undergraduate studies at Queen’s University Belfast before pursuing postgraduate studies at the University of Cambridge on a Newton Scholarship. Jonathan is a member of the European Society for Renaissance Studies, The Centre for the Study of Global Human Movement, as well as, the Ecclesiastical History Society and the Hakluyt Society. Outside of academia, he enjoys Rugby Union.
Remnants of True Religion: The Jesuits Missionaries and Native People of New France 1612-176
Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture
Deborah Hamer is a research associate at the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia. She received her Ph.D. from Columbia University and has taught at Boston College and the University of Miami. Using the Dutch West India Company as a case study, her work seeks to understand how the merchants governors of trading companies constructed and legitimated their authority in a period in which commerce remained morally suspect. Her current project focuses on the West India Company’s reliance on the Amsterdam notary Hendrik Schaef to produce credible information.
Notaries and Knowledge Production: Hendrik Schaef and the Dutch West India Company
Using the notary Hendrik Schaef (active 1638-1665) and his relationship with the Dutch West India Company as a case study, this project argues that historians should attend more to how notarial practice determined what information would enter companies’ records and thus become (re)useable knowledge. At a moment in which official documents were often lost or delayed – because of accident, negligence, or purposeful obstruction – notaries filled a significant void in the early modern information ecosystem, allowing both Company employees and Company authorities to recreate the information they needed to pursue their interests in the Dutch Republic or in the empire. Yet, such archives are often read without regard for the fact that the notarial profession itself still carried with it a taint of immorality. Notaries could just as easily, their critics said, make false information seem true as faithfully reproduce true information. Reading Schaef’s volumes of notarial acts, complete with cross-outs and marginal corrections and additions, in tandem with the genre of conduct guides for notaries and images of notaries at work suggests how the demands of Schaef’s profession shaped which people and what information could become useable for the Company and for the employees who sought to make claims against it.
University of California, San Diego
Mark G. Hanna is associate professor of history at the University of California in San Diego whose work focuses on piracy, smuggling, and other illicit activities in early America and the British Empire. Mark received his B.A. in history at Yale University (1996) and a doctorate in the History of American Civilization at Harvard University (2006). His first book, Pirates Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570-1740 (2015) received numerous awards including the Frederick Jackson Turner Award, the John Ben Snow Prize, and a John Lyman Book Award honorary mention.
Moral Tempests: The Oceanic Origins of Four American Philanthropic Debates and their Modern Implications, 1600-1900
Moral Tempests: The Oceanic Origins of Four American Philanthropic Debates and their Modern Implications, 1600-1900, explores the way maritime conflicts inspired important and meaningful debates on land in colonial America through the late nineteenth century over what we may call today “humanitarian” principles, or what they referred to as “philanthropy.” For example, those who questioned the morality of privateering inspired heated arguments about the legal parameters of war including the rights of private individuals and neutral parties. During the “Age of Sail” jurists, politicians, and novelists argued whether revolutionary uprisings, imperial incursions, or the slave trade were legitimate and justifiable acts or blatant forms of piracy to be condemned. By the early republic many Americans believed they were uniquely poised to lead the world in what they perceived as a global moral transformation. However, this is not a simple narrative of American moral progress. By the 1850s, the United States was one of the only western powers that refused to ban privateering as a form of warfare, its citizens repeatedly invaded sovereign nations, and many Americans began to clamor for the reopening of the slave trade.
Caroline Marris is a doctoral candidate in History at Columbia University in the City of New York, where she is working on a dissertation on the English Channel region in the late sixteenth century. She has served as a teaching assistant for courses in early modern and modern European history and she is currently an Instructor in the University’s Core Curriculum. She has been a member of the Graduate and Early Career Committee of the American Historical Association, and has worked for several years on career diversity programming and development for PhD students in the humanities at Columbia and elsewhere.
The ‘Silver Sea’ and the Nation-State: The Multifaceted Geopolitics of the Early Modern English Channel
The English Channel has received very little critical or academic study in its own right, or even within a historiography of world oceans. My work argues that it was a crucial geographic arena in the political landscape of sixteenth-century Europe, and was a distinct theater of political change in the time of the Spanish Armadas, the Dutch Revolt, and the wide-ranging French Wars of Religion. It further argues for a historiographical pivot in the ways we think about, and write about, water. With some notable exceptions, much of the historiography on world oceans traces human activity on or around shorelines, but rarely further out at sea. Far from being an ‘empty’ or ‘null’ space, activities upon which are unknowable or untraceable, the environment of the early modern Channel demonstrates that water teems with human life (embodied in trade, migration, travel, and naval or scientific activity) and political ambitions. The dissertation as a whole makes a forceful case not just for the importance of understanding contemporary states of geographic knowledge when it comes to our understanding of early modern European politics, but also for putting detail and data behind the old truism that ‘knowledge is power.’
Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Carla J. Mulford, Founding President of the Society of Early Americanists, is Professor of English at Penn State, University Park. She has published nine books and over sixty articles and book chapters. She has studied and written about Benjamin Franklin for the past 25 years, placing him in a transatlantic context, as evidenced by her many publications, including The Cambridge Companion to Benjamin Franklin (2009), Benjamin Franklin and the Ends of Empire (2015; paperback, 2019) and over twenty articles and book chapters in Franklin studies. She is currently completing a book called Benjamin Franklin’s Electrical Diplomacy.
Benjamin Franklin and the Mediterranean
Benjamin Franklin, typically examined through the lens of American studies and “Founders” history, was deeply interested in the trade and culture of the Mediterranean arena. Yet Franklin’s writings on society, empires, and economy have received less attention than his work in the Pennsylvania Assembly and his efforts in the 1760s and early 1770s in behalf of the allied American colonies. Franklin’s writings are replete with his knowledge of peoples and trade networks in the Mediterranean. Even Franklin’s earliest writings reveal his curiosity about Mediterranean goods and people. During his years as an American commissioner and then as Minister Plenipotentiary (1776-1785) in France, Franklin learned first-hand about trade opportunities with different regencies in the Mediterranean and about problems in Mediterranean sea traffic, including piracy and captivity.
Dana Velasco Murillo
UC San Diego
Dana Velasco Murillo (PHD UCLA 2009) is Associate Professor of History at UC San Diego. Velasco Murillo’s research interests center on recovering the histories of the non-elite groups of colonial Mexico’s northern silver mining district, particularly women and native peoples. She is the author of Urban Indians in a Silver City: Zacatecas, Mexico, 1546-1810 (Stanford University Press, 2016). She co-edited City Indians in Spain’s American Empire (Sussex Academic Press, 2012). Her current book project, Chichimeca Arc: War, Peace, and Resettlement in America’s First Borderlands, 1546-1616, centers nomadic indigenous peoples in the development and consolidation of New Spain’s sixteenth-century borderlands.
Chichimeca Arc: War, Peace, and Resettlement in America’s First Borderlands, 1546-1616
The mid-to late sixteenth century war against stateless peoples (1550-1590) in America’s first borderlands—New Spain’s emerging near northern silver mining district—devastated nomadic indigenous populations (generically called Chichimecas). Traditional native hunting and foraging lands experienced intense ecological change and native men and women were killed or sold into long-term or permanent enslavement. Worn down by years of violence and deprivation, native peoples gradually submitted to Spanish rule in the late 1580s, agreeing to resettlement in newly formedreducciones (reservations) near Spanish towns. The focus on state peoples and events casts Iberians and resettled indigenous peoples from central Mexico as the protagonists of this foundational borderland’s history. This book recovers and repositions Chichimecas as central protagonists. It considers how they experienced the war, took an active role in peacemaking, responded to social reorganization in reducciones, and navigated the state’s attempts to transform their lifeways. This study is particularly interested in repositioning women as important protagonists in the course of the conflict, arguing that they took on important roles in the peace process and in reconstituting family life under refugee conditions when they eventually submitted to colonial rule.
Department of History, Northern Illinois University
Brian Sandberg is a Professor of History at Northern Illinois University who works on religion, violence, and political culture during the European Wars of Religion. He has published Warrior Pursuits: Noble Culture and Civil Conflict in Early Modern France (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010), War and Conflict in the Early Modern World, 1500-1700 (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016), and numerous articles and essays. Sandberg has held fellowships from the Institut d’Études Avancées de Paris, the Fulbright Scholar Program (France), the Institute for Research in the Humanities (Madison), the National Endowment for the Humanities (Medici Archive Project), and the European University Institut
Crusading, Religious Violence, and Imperialism in the Early Modern French Mediterranean
My book project, Crusading, Religious Violence, and Imperialism in the Early Modern French Mediterranean, delves into the crusading ideologies that motivated early modern French imperialism. Religious and political treatises, pamphlets, and correspondence of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries evoked Louis IX and French crusades in the Holy Land. This book examines French involvement in early modern Mediterranean conflicts and in domestic religious violence during the French Wars of Religion (1562-1629). Fluid concepts of crusading could be deployed by French Protestants and Catholics against blasphemers, unclean, heretics, and infidels inside the kingdom and worldwide. Crusading impulses contributed to the formation of French imperialism and early notions of globalization, which arguably redefined the French relationship with the Mediterranean in lasting ways. The call to wage holy war suggests that complex, but powerful, forms of racial and religious identification were operative in the early modern Mediterranean. The crusading ideologies that coalesced during this period of extensive religious warfare blurred the lines between infidels and heretics in fascinating ways that had global implications. Understandings of religious violence that were forged in the Mediterranean thus contributed to broader French ideologies of empire at the moment when France launched its global imperial project.